Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Humphreys

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 25, 1960No. 38833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

In this action, plaintiff in error, Maude I. Roberts, hereafter referred to as .“plaintiff”, seeks to cancel a warranty deed under date of July 28, 1958, by the provisions of which she purported to convey to defendants in error, Fleeta Teeter Humphreys, hereafter referred to as “Fleeta”, and George Howard Teeter, hereafter referred to as “George”, fee simple title to a 160-acre farm lying in Tillman County, Oklahoma, less a reserved life estate. Fleeta is plaintiff’s sister. George is the son of plaintiff’s brother, Grover Teeter, hereafter referred to as “Grover”.

In the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hogan v. LeeperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Montgomery v. WillbanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. White v. MorrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Johnston v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Bergman v. SmalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gray v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Zimmerman v. NewportSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. LaDoux v. BohnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. Treece v. TreeceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Bratton v. OwensCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API