Legal Opinion

Treece v. Treece

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 31, 1961No. 39295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

This action was commenced by Lulu Ann Treece to cancel a deed made to her son, Walter V. Treece. The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Both parties waived jury and no special findings of fact or law were requested.

The trial court found the issues generally in favor of the defendant, denied plaintiff any relief and entered judgment in favor of defendant quieting title to the land in him. Plaintiff has appealed and challenges the judgment on the ground that it is not supported by the evidence and is contrary to law.

The plaintiff in her brief states…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Sporn v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  4. Flowers v. FlowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Bush v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. PotterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. English v. RainwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Bowen v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Bowen v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. McManus v. HullSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API