Legal Opinion

Belshaw v. Feinstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1968No. Civ. 23114PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

Defendants in a medical malpractice action appeal from judgment, after jury verdict, in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $155,000..

Questions Presented

1. The conditional res ipsa loquitur instruction needed to be given.

2. Absent the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, there was evidence of negligence.

3. Defendants did not waive their rights to question the giving of the res ipsa loquitur instruction.

4. The action is not barred by the written release signed by plaintiff.

Record

Dr. Bertram Feinstein and Dr. Grant Levin are physicians and surgeons practicing in San Francisco and specializing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Siverson v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Courbat v. Dahana Ranch, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Olson v. MolzenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Putensen v. Clay Adams, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Berkey v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API