Olson v. Molzen
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
The sole question before the Court is whether a Doctor of Osteopathy may defend a negligence action on the basis of an exculpatory agreement executed by his patient prior to the rendition of services.
Plaintiff’s suit was dismissed pursuant to a Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56, Tenn.R.Civ.P. The action of the trial judge was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, which held that the agreement was valid in all respects, and not against public policy.
I
On September 17, 1973, Janet H. Olson, a pregnant, twenty-three year old unmarried woman, contacted Bob J. Molzen, at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Empress Health and Beauty Spa, Inc. v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
- Moss v. FortuneTennessee Supreme Court · 1960
- Dixon v. ManierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Planters Gin Co. v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Tonya Cooper v. Mrm Investment Company, Terry Rogers and Larry MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Buraczynski v. EyringTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Santa Barbara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.