Legal Opinion

Hough v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 1864PublishedCited by 10 opinions

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OR RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities of Plaintiff in'Error. 1. The facts found by the com-t below entitle the Plaintiff in error to judgment under the statute, for the amount demanded in the complaint. The judgment below should therefore be reversed. The Plaintiff should have judgment in this court for that amount. Sess. Laws of 1851, {Gen. Less.) eh. 2, sees. 1, 2; Lev.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OR RAMSEY COUNTY. Points and authorities of Plaintiff in'Error. 1. The facts found by the com-t below entitle the Plaintiff in error to judgment under the statute, for the amount demanded in the complaint. The judgment below should therefore be reversed. The Plaintiff should have judgment in this court for that amount. Sess. Laws of 1851, {Gen. Less.) eh. 2, sees. 1, 2; Lev. Mats, of 1851,p. 62, secs. 4, 5; Ld.,p. 60, see. 2J1; Ld.,p. 384, see. 24. 2. The provisions of see. 13, eh. 2, óyt the Laws of 1860, {Sess. Laws of 1860, p. 55,) have no application to this…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

Atwater, J.

The Plaintiff in error was Register of Deeds in and for Ramsey County during the years 1860-1, and brought his action to recover compensation for services rendered in that capacity during those years. The cause was tried by the court (a jury trial having been waived), and the facts will sufficiently appear from the finding of the Judge (Hon. E. C. Palmer), which is as follows:

“ That from the first day of January, 1860, up to the first day of January, A. D. 1862, the said Plaintiff was the duly elected and qualified Register of Deeds of the County of Ramsey, and’during…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MeanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Carlson v. Presbyterian Board of ReliefSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. State v. RingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  4. Curtiss v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Casey v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API