Curtiss v. Livingston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Eice ■county, Buckham, J., presiding, overruling their demurrer to the ■complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
The complaint shows the plaintiff Della M. to have become, on March 23, 1879, owner in fee of certain real estate, and alleges that on that day the plaintiffs executed to Eichmond Jones and wife a lease of the real estate for and during their natural lives. It then alleges “that the defendants, after the execution and delivery thereof, succeeded to and became posssssed of the life-interest of said Eichmond Jones and wife, and thereupon and thereunder took, and ever since have remained in, the actual possession •of said premises.” It then sets forth acts of wilful waste by defendants on said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Derby v. GallupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
- Hough v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864
- Lawrence v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
- Guerin v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
- Short v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1816
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jowdy v. GuerinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- McArthur v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Carlton v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Travelers Insurance v. HallauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Atwater v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.