Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilbert Dowdy, Carol Coe

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 1, 1992No. 91-2183PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Carol Coe appeals from the district court’s order holding her in contempt of court pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 42(a). We affirm.

I

Carol Coe represented one of four defendants who were tried together on various criminal charges. Coe’s conduct early in the proceedings prompted the trial judge to warn Coe, during a conference in the judge’s chambers, that the court would hold her in contempt and fine her one hundred dollars each time she disobeyed an order of the court. Coe was specifically warned against continuing to argue with the court after being ordered to be quiet.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Mayberry v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Sacher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert L. Turner, Also Known as Rob, United States of America v. Gilbert L. Dowdy, United States of America v. Steven D. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Meekison v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
  3. In Re CoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  4. United States v. Miles A. Galin, Robert E. Goldman, Contemnor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re CoeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API