Meekison v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MARBLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s (“ODRC”) Motion for Reconsideration. Defendant has asked that this Court reconsider its ruling on Defendants’ *572Motion for Summary Judgment, as set forth in the Court’s August 21, 1998, Opinion and Order, in light of the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in Brickers v. Cleveland Board of Education, 145 F.3d 846 (6th Cir.1998). For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration.
As a general principle, motions for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Todd Shipyards Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Auto Transportation, S.A., Intervenor-Appellee v. Turbine Service, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Linda Brickers v. Cleveland Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Jefferson v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Alford v. Chambers-SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Bethel v. Warden Ohio State PenitentiaryDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
- Chinn v. Warden MansfieldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
- Cole v. RiceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
- Coleman v. ChristiansenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.