Legal Opinion
In Re Coe
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided July 25, 1995No. 75474Published
1Opinion of the Court
903 S.W.2d 916 (1995)
In re Carol COE, Respondent.
No. 75474.
Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc.
July 25, 1995.
John E. Howe, Sam Phillips, Jefferson City, for informant.
Carl W. Bussey, Kansas City, for respondent.
ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
BENTON, Judge.
The Chief Disciplinary Counsel charges attorney Carol Coe with "conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal." Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.5(c). After reviewing the evidence de novo, this Court concludes that Coe violated Rule 3.5(c), and orders a public reprimand.
I
The charge stems from a 39-day, four-defendant, criminal conspiracy trial…
Also in this document: Dissent · Covington; Dissent · Covington.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Robert L. Turner, Also Known as Rob, United States of America v. Gilbert L. Dowdy, United States of America v. Steven D. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Ford v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.