Legal Opinion

Home Insurance Co. v. Akers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 18, 1923No. 11144PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This was a cause of action brought to reform a policy of fire insurance issued by the Home Insurance Company of New York to J. H. Akers, on the ground that a mistake was made in the description of the lots on which a part of the insured prop-ferty was located. Plaintiff also seeks to fenforce payment of the policy after same is reformed, because of the loss of said- property by fire during the time the policy was in force.

The material parts of the plaintiff’s petition are as follows:

That on or about August 3, 1917, he was the owner of a one-story frame building with metal roof in which he had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Ins. Co. v. ChanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Cleveland v. RankinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Davis v. Keeche Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Forester v. AukenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Burch v. StaplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. OlsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. StanleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Matlock v. WheelerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Davis v. Universal Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API