Legal Opinion

Lampi v. Speed

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2011No. DA 10-0169PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 The Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Carbon County, denied motions for summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law filed by Appellant Rohnn Lampi (Lampi). Lampi sought an order that restoration damages constituted the appropriate measure of damages for his fire loss claim. The court also denied Lampi’s motion in limine to exclude evidence of diminution in market value of Lampi’s property caused by the fire and Lampi’s objection to a jury instruction. We apply Restatement (Second) of Torts § 929 as adopted by our decision in Sunburst School Dist. No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc., 2007 MT…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Roman Catholic Church v. Louisiana Gas Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Weld County Bd. of County Com'rs v. SlovekSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. ChristianSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. McEwen v. MCR, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. George E. Morabit v. Dennis HoagSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. H & H Development, LLC v. RamlowMontana Supreme Court · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API