Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 20, 2024No. 1:22-cv-02906Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 22-cv-02906-PAB-MDB RAY ARMSTRONG, an individual, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Complete Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21]. Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) seeks summary judgment as to all of plaintiff Ray Armstrong’s claims. Id. at 1. Plaintiff Ray Armstrong filed a response opposing the motion, Docket No. 27, and State Farm filed a reply. Docket No. 31. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Faustin v. City and CountyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.