Legal Opinion

Narragansett Indian Tribe v. State of Rhode Island and UTGR, Inc. d/b/a Twin River and Newport Grand, LLC,Intervenor

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 10, 2014No. 2012-323-AppealPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice INDEGLIA,

for the Court.

The defendant, the State of Rhode Island (State), appeals from the entry of partial summary judgment in the Superior Court for the plaintiff, the Narragansett Indian Tribe (Tribe), finding that the plaintiff had standing to pursue a constitutional challenge to the 2011 Casino Act, G.L.1956 § 42-61.2-2.1, as enacted by P.L. 2011, ch. 151, art. 25, § 2. 1 This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on December 4, 2013, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Pontbriand v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. McKenna v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Burns v. SundlunSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Michael Moura v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  2. Hexagon Holdings, Inc. v. Carlisle Syntec IncorporatedSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  3. Sophie F. Danforth v. Timothy T. More, NosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Note Capital Group, Inc. v. Michele PerrettaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019
  5. Thomas Shannahan v. Charles D. MoreauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2019

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API