Legal Opinion
Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1983No. 82-5805PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a district court order which stayed all proceedings in an action which included two claims within exclusive federal jurisdiction: one claim charged a violation of section 10(b) of the 1934 Securities Act, and the other, a breach of fiduciary duty under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (ERISA). The order was based on the district court’s desire to avoid duplicative litigation. Since there already existed four separate state court actions involving the same parties and similar issues, the district court concluded that principles of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Intel Corporation v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- The Clorox Company v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Carol Stower, Real PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Sullivan v. First Affiliated Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- John Cottrell v. Michael DukeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.