Legal Opinion
The Clorox Company v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Carol Stower, Real Party
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 26, 1985No. 83-7815PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SKOPIL, Circuit Judge:
Clorox Company (“Clorox”) petitions for a writ of mandamus requiring the district court to vacate its order remanding this action to the state court from which it was removed. The previous opinion of this court, reported at 756 F.2d 699 (9th Cir. 1985), denying the petition for a writ of mandamus is hereby withdrawn and replaced by this opinion. We grant Clorox’s petition for rehearing but find it unnecessary to hold a second round of oral argument. On the limited facts of this case, we construe the petition for a writ of mandamus as a notice of appeal and reverse the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Foster v. Chesapeake Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ethridge V. Harbor House RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.