In Re Isch
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the sheriff of San' Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
The question presented by this proceeding is as to the validity of the provision of Ordinance No. 168 of San Bernardino County prescribing the penalty for a violation of such ordinance. The ordinance is one enacted by the board of supervisors of that county prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors within the county outside of municipal corporations. The section prescribing the penalty is section 18, and is as follows: “Any person violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding six…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex parte CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Arfsten v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- In re Ah YouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex parte SolomonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Doble v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re MaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. CordovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.