In Re Maas
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus wherein petitioner alleges that he is restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of the county of Orange under a commitment issued upon default in payment of a fine assessed against him for a violation of an ordinance adopted by the board of supervisors of said county, entitled “An ordinance regulating the use of water from pumping wells and to prevent the waste and flow thereof and the defining of waste of such water.”
Section 1 of the ordinance under consideration provides that it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, etc., to cause, permit…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. VelardeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Ex Parte ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Ex parte CheneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In Re IschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by11 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. AitkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Allegretti & Co. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Baldwin v. County of TehamaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.