Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 21, 2009No. Misc. Docket AG No. 11 September Term, 2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Respondents Renard D. Johnson and Will Purcell. Bar Counsel alleged that Respondent Johnson violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”) 1.15(b) 1 , 5.1(b) and (c) 2 , 5.3(b) and (c) 3 , and 8.4(a) and (c) 4 and that Respondent Purcell violated MRPC 1.15(b) and 8.4(a) and (c). These allegations stemmed from Respondents’ involvement in a “lease/buy-back” agreement regarding residential real property.

On December 2 and 3, 2008, Judge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SweitzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Zilichikhis v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SeltzerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GraceyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API