Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Badoian

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 28, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs commenced five separate actions in the Superior Court against five defendants. Verdicts were returned for the plaintiffs, and judgments were entered against all the defendants. Although the defendants purported to consolidate all the cases on appeal, only three of the five are considered herein, as no effective appeal has been taken by Patriot Homes, Inc., or Tocco, individually. See Tucker v. Patriot Homes, Inc., post, 909 (1977). 1. The defendants Badoian and Morningside assert that the law is clear that a property owner is not liable for damages to adjoining property…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. RatcliffeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Pietrazak v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Sandler v. ElliottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Muzi v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  5. Deyo v. Athol Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BadoianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Coughlin v. GascombeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API