Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Badoian

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 27, 1978PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuirico, J.

The plaintiffs in these two actions seek to recover damages that they claim were caused to their land and the house thereon by the alleged negligence of the defendants. The plaintiffs contend that the defendants negligently made certain physical changes to their own land, which abuts that of the plaintiffs, thereby causing large quantities of water to collect on the plaintiffs’ lot and in the cellar of their house. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs in the amount of $60,000 in each of the two actions. The defendants moved for a new trial, and, after a hearing thereon, the judge…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Armstrong v. Francis Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. State v. DeetzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Belkus v. City of BrocktonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Whitinsville Plaza, Inc. v. KotseasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. International Fidelity Insurance v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  5. Mouradian v. General Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API