Legal Opinion
Muzi v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 3, 1956PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
The petitioner excepted to the refusal of the trial* judge to permit two real estate appraisers to testify to their opinions of the value of the petitioner’s real estate in Needham before and after the taking of some of it, on August 5, 1953, for the purposes of the location of the new limited access highway known as Route 128. An appraiser for the respondent was permitted to testify to bis opinion subject to the petitioner’s objection and exception. The petitioner also excepted to the exclusion of testimony offered to support the qualifications of one of the appraisers.
The petitioner’s real…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rubin v. Town of ArlingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- Muskeget Island Club v. Inhabitants of NantucketMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Conness v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Manning v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Lyman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. SeitMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Bernier v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. GodinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- McLaughlin v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.