Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Sandler v. Elliott

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 21, 1957PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

These are two actions of tort for deceit. There was a verdict for the plaintiff in each case which the trial judge set aside pursuant to leave reserved. The plaintiff duly excepted in each case. The declarations were in substance identical. The defendant Elliott contends both that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict and that there was a material variance.

I. The case against Elliott.

1. We consider first the action in which Bernard S. Elliott is the defendant. The substitute declaration was filed just before trial. It averred, in part, that “the defendant by fraudulently…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Yorke v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
  3. Bucholz v. Green Bros. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Nash v. Minnesota Title Insurance & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Kilroy v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Robert B. Turner v. Johnson & Johnson, Robert B. Turner v. Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson and Charles M. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. Pridgen v. Boston Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Rice v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Levy v. BendetsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API