Legal Opinion

Orlikoff v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 22, 1953No. 57707; petition 6827-R (San Diego)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

This is a petition for remission of additional duties filed under authority of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1489). The merchandise, which was entered at values lower than those found on final appraisement, consisted of three importations of Mexican huaraches, imported during February and March 1943. At the hearing, the record in reappraisements 154212-A, etc., decided by the single judge and reported in 25 Cust. Ct. 414 (Reap. Dec. 7577), and on appeal in 25 Cust. Ct. 441 (Reap. Dec. 7892), was offered and received in evidence. The huaraches were invoiced…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. A. Orlikoff of Mexican Artcraft Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
  3. Caradine Hat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Orlikoff v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Orlikoff v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API