Legal Opinion

Caradine Hat Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 31, 1950No. 7876; Entry Nos. 415 and 568; 925 and 6570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

These are appeals for reappraisement of shipments of palm leaf hat bodies produced in the Tehuacan and Puebla *412regions of Mexico and imported into the United States at the ports of St. Louis, Mo., and Laredo, Tex. The appraiser found values for a portion of the items in the shipments on the basis of foreign value (section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended), which values were higher than those at which the merchandise was invoiced and entered. As to those items, which will be enumerated below, the importers, plaintiffs herein, claim that the invoiced and entered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sternfeld v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. United States v. Tadross & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Packers, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Orlikoff v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API