Legal Opinion · Dissent

Orlikoff v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 24, 1956No. 59931; petition 6911-R (San Diego)Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Olives, Chief Judge:

I respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached by my colleagues in this case.

The record herein establishes a set of facts substantially the same as those which were found by the court in A. Orlikoff and Mexican Artcraft Company v. United States (31 Cust. Ct. 350, Abstract 57707; rehearing denied, 32 Cust. Ct. 425, Abstract 57917, and not appealed). That case, like the one now before us, involved a petition for the remission of additional duties imposed on importations of huaraches from Mexico. Here, as there, the shipments under consideration were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolf v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Orlikoff v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  3. A. Orlikoff of Mexican Artcraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API