Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
The Winklevoss plaintiffs (collectively, “Winklevoss”) seek a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201 that an insurance policy issued by defendant Federal Insurance Company requires Federal to defend and indemnify Winklevoss for business tort and trade secret claims brought in a separate action pending here in the Northern District *417of Illinois.1 The underlying suit, entitled Lynchval Systems, Inc. v. Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. et al., alleges that Winklevoss misappropriated proprietary formulas Lynchval used to develop its computer…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- M.F.A. Mutual Insurance v. CheekIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Patricia M. Krueger, and American States Insurance Company, Intervening v. James S. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Travelers Insurance Companies v. Penda CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- United National Insurance Company v. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Company, Wausau Underwriters Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Altom Transport, Inc. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- CFI of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- ATLANTA GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021
- Admiral Insurance Company v. J.R. Plaza Hotel II, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.