Legal Opinion
Sudarsky v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 3, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered February 19, 1997, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a late notice of claim and granted defendants’ cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We decline to give the prior decision of this Court in this action (220 AD2d 353) law of the case effect as to anything other than “legal determinations that were necessarily resolved on the merits in the prior decision” (Baldasano v Bank of N. Y., 199 AD2d 184, 185). As such, none of the parties’ arguments on this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Manocherian v. Lenox Hill HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Baldasano v. Bank of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Rios v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Sudarsky v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Campbell v. Command Security, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gilligan v. ReersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Sudarsky v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC v. MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC v. MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014