Legal Opinion
Rios v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 1992PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to file a late notice of claim, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated March 9, 1990, which denied the application.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner Miguel Rios claims that on November 30, 1988, he fell on a defective sidewalk owned and maintained by the City of New York, as a result of which he sustained a fractured leg. There is no indication that any accident report was ever made or filed and nothing before us demonstrates that a record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perry v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Morgan v. City of ElmiraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Setton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Coyne v. Cold-Spring Harbor Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Khalid v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Mitchell v. Town of GreenburghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Konstantinides v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Adlowitz v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.