Legal Opinion
Phoenix Electrical Contracting Corp. v. New York Telephone Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter Tom, J.
Defendant John Charles moves for an order (1) disqualifying *251the law firm of Kurtzman & Haspel (the Kurtzman Firm) from representing plaintiff in this action and (2) enjoining and restraining the Kurtzman Firm and all members and associates from disclosing and revealing to plaintiff or substitute counsel, any of the information that it has obtained in acting as both trustee in bankruptcy of defendant Walter T. Murphy Construction, Inc. (Murphy) and as attorney in the present action.
In this action, plaintiff as subcontractor for defendant Murphy performed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Rotante v. Lawrence HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Edelman v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Eisemann v. . HazardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Crystal Apparel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998