Rotante v. Lawrence Hospital
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStetjer, J.
The facts are not in dispute. The action is in malpractice and the moving defendant is one of the defendants being sued. He is a doctor and insured by Professional Insurance Company. The insurer undertook to defend the action on behalf of its insured and retained the firm of Turkewitz & Tessel for this purpose. Mr. Turkewitz appeared as attorney of record. He consulted with defendant Goodlier and prepared a lengthy analysis of the case. Thereafter he represented Hr. Goodner on an examination before trial. Twelve days thereafter Mr.. Turkewitz was hired as an attorney by the firm representing…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Cardinale v. GolinelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. KAWSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- In re HofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Nichols v. Village Voice, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979
- Rodriguez v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.