Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Parlier

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 13, 1952No. 347PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMán, Judge:

This case involves the admissibility in evidence of an otherwise acceptable morning report extract copy in the absence of a notation thereon of the signature of the officer authenticating the original morning report éntry.

The accused, Parlier, was tried at Fort Sam Houston, Texas, on August 14, 1951, under a specification alleging desertion from July 5, 1943, until termination by return to military control on December 22, 1950, in violation of Article of War 58, 10 USC § 1530. He was found guilty as charged and sentenced to be dishonorably discharged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. MasusockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. Stebbins v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. In Re DeihlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1987
  4. Stubbe v. Rodriguez Estrada (In Re San Juan Hotel Corp.)District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1987
  5. United States v. CreamerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. McClennyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. McNamaraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. RenerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  5. United States v. SchaibleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API