Vereda, Ltda. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER CERTIFYING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS
SMITH, Chief Judge.
In Vereda, Ltda. v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 495 (1998) (Opinion), vacated in part on reconsideration, 46 Fed.Cl. 12 (1999) (Revised Order), the Court held that it had jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim of a Fifth Amendment taking of its mortgage interest through administrative forfeiture by the Drug Enforcement Administration. However, the Court specifically noted that “an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2) may be appropriate” on this issue. 46 Fed.Cl. at 19. Subsequently, defendant sought…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Annie Lou Crocker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Carl and Mary Shelden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009