Legal Opinion

Vereda, Ltda. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 4, 2000No. 96-256CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CERTIFYING INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS

SMITH, Chief Judge.

In Vereda, Ltda. v. United States, 41 Fed.Cl. 495 (1998) (Opinion), vacated in part on reconsideration, 46 Fed.Cl. 12 (1999) (Revised Order), the Court held that it had jurisdiction over plaintiffs claim of a Fifth Amendment taking of its mortgage interest through administrative forfeiture by the Drug Enforcement Administration. However, the Court specifically noted that “an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(d)(2) may be appropriate” on this issue. 46 Fed.Cl. at 19. Subsequently, defendant sought…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Annie Lou Crocker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. Carl and Mary Shelden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. American Management Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Scholl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API