Legal Opinion
Carl and Mary Shelden v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 15, 1993No. 92-5154PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
Carl and Mary Shelden appeal from the June 24, 1992 decision of the United States Claims Court, 1 Shelden v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 375 (1992) (Shelden II), vacating the same court’s January 12, 1990 decision, Shelden v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 247 (1990) CShelden I). In Shelden II the Claims Court held that the Sheldens, as mortgagees of property forfeited to the United States, suffered no taking by the government that would be compensable under the Fifth Amendment. Because the United States took a well-recognized property right held by the Sheldens when it acquired…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Parcel of Rumson, NJ, LandSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Moden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Kam-Almez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Acadia Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vereda, Ltda. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- AmeriSource Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.