Legal Opinion

Carter v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 30, 1990No. 88-1576PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MAYER, Circuit Judge.

There is no merit to the government’s motion to strike appellants’ brief in response to the government’s suggestion for rehearing in banc on the ground that an internal Department of Justice memorandum appended to it contains matter protected by the attorney-client privilege. Apparently, the government inadvertently appended the memorandum to appellants’ copy of an earlier government motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing. Written by the Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division and intended for the Solicitor General, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re Echostar Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. In Re Columbia/Hca Healthcare Corporation Billing Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. In Re Grand Jury (Impounded)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  5. Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API