Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury (Impounded)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 13, 1998No. 97-7347PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. JURISDICTION
Thomas J. Capano appeals from an order entered in the district court on June 27,1997, holding that he waived the attorney work product privilege with respect to certain documents he created which the United States seized from a third party pursuant to a subpoena.1 The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction to review the order of the district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Cf. In re Grand Jury, 111 F.3d 1066, 1073-77 (3d Cir.1997) (holding that a denial of an order to quash a subpoena not…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Jose De La JaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Livingstone v. North Belle Vernon BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- In Re Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Holmes v. Pension Plan of Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- In Re Chevron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Maldonado v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Harris v. DrakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.