Bank of California v. Young
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
A draft such as the one drawn by the defendant in this case is a negotiable instrument. It is made so by the negotiable instrument statute of Oregon: Or. L., §7793. When the plain tiff is a holder in due course, for value, of the commercial paper in question, then he is entitled to recover thereon, regardless of the defense of an alleged existence of the relationship of principal and agent between the original depositary and the depositor: Or. L., § 7849. These propositions of law cannot be controverted.
The plaintiff does not question the well-established rule that, when a negotiable…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Old National Bank v. GibsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Jefferson County Savings Bank v. HendrixSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Vickers v. Machinery Warehouse & Sales Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Bank of California National Ass'n v. Portland Hide & Wool Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Steele v. Bank of California National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- First Nat. Bank v. Cross NapperLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Ruden v. Agricultural Finance Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932