Ruden v. Agricultural Finance Corp.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
On November 17, 1930, intervener, B. A. Voegele, presented to the First State Bank of Onaka, S. D., a check for $458. 83 indorsed by him in 'blank which was drawn to his order upon the First 'National Bank of Watertown, S. D., by the defendant, Agricultural Finance Corporation, and received a deposit slip upon which was printed: “All items on- other banks are received for collection only. If you are given immediate credit, you should remember that it is subject to final payment. This bank will use due diligence in its endeavor to’select responsible agents but will not be liable for their…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- President of the Bank of the Metropolis v. President of the New England BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Manufacturers' National Bank v. Continental BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Blacher v. Nat. Bank of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Bromfield v. CochranSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Garrison v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.