Legal Opinion

Bank of California National Ass'n v. Portland Hide & Wool Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

Testimony was offered by the defendant showing that at the time of the trial plaintiff held $24,000 in cash from the collateral and the defendant endeavored to produce additional evidence to show payment. The court, however, struck out the evidence showing cash held by the respondent and refused to permit evidence showing payment and instructed the jury to disregard such evidence.

It appears that at the opening of business, November 30, 1926, the Bank of Kenton owed the plaintiff bank an overdraft in the collateral account from the preceding day of $4,574.97. The total deposits by the Bank of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Downs v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Thomas v. MatthiessenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mattson v. Commercial Credit Business Loans, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Riley v. GoodOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hogg v. Real Estate CommissionerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. American Surety Co. v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Citizens Bank of Oregon v. American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API