Pure Oil Co. v. Peck
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
Appellant contends that the Ohio intangible tax on deposits is determined by the taxable status of the person having the beneficial interest therein, rather than the taxable status of the person having the right of withdrawal. Appellant claims further that the deposits in question were held by it in a fiduciary capacity only; that it had no beneficial interest therein; but that, on the other hand, they belonged to persons and governmental authorities and, therefore, were not subject to taxation.
The sole question presented is whether general deposits in out-of-state banks, withdrawable as such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fulton v. Escanaba Paper Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Squire v. American Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Squire, Supt. v. OxenreiterOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Busher, Clerk v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Merchants & Mechanics Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.