Legal Opinion
Malhame v. Borough of Demarest
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided August 3, 1978PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
162 N.J. Super. 248 (1978)
392 A.2d 652
JOHN F. MALHAME AND LESLIE MALHAME, H/W, WILLIAM PECORARO AND JUDITH PECORARO, H/W AND ARNOLD ZIMMERMAN AND CATHERINE ZIMMERMAN, H/W, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BOROUGH OF DEMAREST, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided August 3, 1978.
Mr. Antranig Aslanian, Jr. for plaintiff.
Mr. M. Robert De Cotiis for defendant Borough of Demarest (Messrs. Andora, Palmisano, DeCotiis, and Harris, attorneys).
O'HALLORAN, J.D.C. (temporarily assigned).
This action is brought by John and Leslie Malhame, William and Judith Pecoraro, and Arnold and Catherine…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Borough of Cresskill v. Borough of DumontSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Sans v. Ramsey Golf & Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Benton v. KernanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
- Poulos v. Dover Boiler & Plate FabricatorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. HollandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- John Ross v. Karen A. Lowitz (074200)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Rowe v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Malhame v. Borough of DemarestNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
- Saldana v. City of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Rose v. ChaikinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.