Legal Opinion
Rose v. Chaikin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 10, 1982PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
187 N.J. Super. 210 (1982)
453 A.2d 1378
JOEL ROSE ET UX., ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
JOSEPH CHAIKIN ET UX., DEFENDANTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,
v.
KENNETH L. KESLINK, ENERTECH CORPORATION, A CORPORATION OF VERMONT, AND CITY OF BRIGANTINE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Atlantic County.
Decided November 10, 1982.
Stephen R. Nehmad for plaintiffs (Perskie & Nehmad, attorneys).
Marvin Z. Wallen for defendants and third-party plaintiffs (Wallen & Brilliant, attorneys).
Augustine A. Repetto, Jr. for third-party defendant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Hutton Pk. Gardens v. West Orange Town CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Home Builders League of South Jersey, Inc. v. Township of BerlinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sowers v. Forest Hills SubdivisionNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Funeral Home Mgmt. v. BasralianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Sheppard v. Township of FrankfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Cronin v. Township CommitteeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Burbridge v. PaschalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.