Legal Opinion

Lomax v. Warden

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 7, 1998No. 83, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRELL, Judge.

Mr. Walter E. Lomax, appellant, essentially asks us to determine whether a statement the Governor made at a press conference is more than merely “news.” In this case, we answer no.

This appeal from the denial of what facially is styled as a habeas corpus petition focuses primarily on the nature, constitutionality, and effect of Governor Glendening’s pronouncement during a press conference on 21 September 1995 that he would not approve parole for “violent offenders” sentenced to life imprisonment unless they were very old or terminally ill. Governor Glendening stated that “[i]f…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. John J. Rodriguez v. United States Parole Commission and Metropolitan Correctional Center, Robert Elsea, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. William J. Prater v. U.S. Parole Commission and Thomas Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lomax v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. BeardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Simms v. Shearin, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Mateen v. GalleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Green v. HutchinsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API