Legal Opinion
Lomax v. Warden
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 9, 1999No. 45, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
The Maryland Parole Commission has the statutory duty to “review and make recommendations to the Governor: (i) concerning parole of an inmate under a sentence of life imprisonment....” Maryland Code (1999), § 7-206(3) of the Correctional Services Article. With certain exceptions, “an inmate who has been sentenced to life imprisonment is not eligible for parole consideration until the inmate has served 15 years or the equivalent of 15 years considering the allowances for diminution of the inmate’s term of confinement----” § 7-301(d)(1) of the Correctional Services Article.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lewis v. DiethornSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- PORTLEY v. GROSSMAN, WARDEN, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Maryland v. KanarasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Khalifa v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Carter, Bowie, McCullough v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Watkins v. Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Secretary, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. DembyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.