Barba v. Perez
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
Following a special verdict by the jury, the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent Antonio Barba for $117,053.42 against defendant and appellant Lupe Perez. Following judgment, Perez moved to tax certain costs Barba had claimed under Code of Civil Procedure section 998.1 Perez’s motion was denied in part and granted in part.
Perez appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion to tax costs, contending that (1) the jury’s verdict is not supported by substantial evidence; (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion for nonsuit based on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- T. M. Cobb Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Elrod v. Oregon Cummins Diesel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Najera v. HuertaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Lee v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Barba v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bean v. Pacific Coast Elevator Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.