Legal Opinion

Mazuran v. Finn

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1921No. Civ. No. 3900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the sale of personal property under execution. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of mandate directing respondent, as sheriff, to sell certain personal property levied upon by him under execution. The petitioner, as plaintiff in an action against Frank F. Akaeich and George Dimmich, was awarded judgment in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco in the sum of $5,000, with interest and costs, no part of which having been paid, the respondent, under instructions, levied a writ of execution upon a linotype machine, and its accessories, alleged to belong to the judgment debtor, Akaeich. John H. Leighton and E. E. Carreras…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Board of Education v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kellogg v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Paden v. GoldbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Morgan v. ThriftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winick Corp. v. County Sanitation District No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. MonserudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Castera v. GabellieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API