Kellogg v. Burr
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Waldo M. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
—Action in claim and delivery. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
On the 28th of June, 1895, the plaintiff was the proprietor of a butcher shop in Pasadena, and the owner of the personal property in question, being such as is usually used by retail butchers. On that dav he entered into a contract with Kent & Yeale, by which he sold to them said personal property for the sum of thirteen hundred and fifty dollars—five hundred dollars to be paid on July 1st; fifty dollars per month,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Dubois v. SpinksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Triscony v. BeasleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Whetmore v. RupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Paden v. GoldbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Christensen v. Nugget Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- National Bank of New Zealand, Ltd. v. FinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Brinkley-Douglas Fruit Co. v. SilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Duncan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Aber v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.