Paden v. Goldbaum
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from Superior Court, San Diego County; W. L. Pierce, Judge. Action by Flora J. Paden against Simon Goldbaum and B. F. Hubbert for the conversion of livestock. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
In this action the plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appeal therefrom and from an order denying a new trial. The complaint alleged that on January 13, 1893, the plaintiff, the wife of Alfred Paden, was the owner of certain milch cows and other cattle, and of certain horses and other personal property; that .defendants, knowing that it was her separate property, took possession, and converted it to their own use, under the false pretenses that it was the property of her husband, to her damage in the sum of $3,000. Hubbert justified, alleging that he was a constable, and took the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. Clear Lake Water WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Johnson v. KleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Williams v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Barry v. McGradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kellogg v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Brenot v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Aber v. TwichellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Harris v. Van De VanterWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Sunset Realty Co. v. DadmunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.