Legal Opinion

State v. Sherburne

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 2, 1990PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The defendants, Donald and Gary Sher-burne, appeal from a decision of the Superi- or Court (Penobscot County, Smith, J.) affirming their convictions in the District Court (Newport, Cox, J.) for possession of fish in violation of a regulation of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife. 12 M.R.S.A. § 7604 (1981).1 The Sher-burnes contend that the evidence used against them, secured as the result of a roadblock conducted by the Maine Warden Service, should have been suppressed. They further maintain that there was insufficient evidence of their possession and that the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Jackie David MillerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. DeskinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. PattersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. People v. MaikhioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. State v. KremenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  5. State v. Seamen's ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API