Legal Opinion

State v. Spicer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1997No. 95C-21159; CA A90794PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order suppressing the results of defendant’s field sobriety tests. ORS 138.060(3). Relying on State v. Fish, 321 Or 48, 893 P2d 1023 (1995), the trial court ruled that all of the tests performed by defendant were “testimonial” under Article I, section 12, 1 of the Oregon Constitution. We have since held otherwise. State v. Nielsen, 147 Or App 294, 936 P2d 374 (1997). Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

On December 17, 1994, a deputy sheriff stopped defendant’s vehicle after observing him speeding and drifting from lane to lane without signaling. On contacting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. NagelOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. GileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API