Legal Opinion

State v. Gile

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 16, 1997No. 94D102833; CA A90532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence of defendant’s performance of certain field sobriety tests, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that all of the tests are “testimonial” in nature and therefore subject to the right against self-incrimination contained in Article I, section 12, of the Oregon Constitution. Defendant argues that the trial court correctly concluded that all of the field sobriety tests are testimonial and that evidence of the results of those tests properly was suppressed. We conclude that one of the tests is testimonial in nature and subject…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FishOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. SpicerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. EskieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API